I realized and I experienced firsthand that if I bring my creativity in and I start doing things differently and doing things innovatively, that that helps me in my career and that helps overall to make data more valuable. Right? That is just what I experienced. And I also experienced the other side, which is that most people I talk to in data, they would tell me, yeah, I'm not like you, I'm not a creative person, right? That's why I chose to work in data. But that on itself is not contradicting, I say, right? Just because you're working on data doesn't mean you're not creative. And even more, if you are working on structured things, you could also be creative with that structure that you have and maybe within those guardrails, be creative the way you want to, because necessity usually makes people creative anyway. And the other side of it is more about the technology of AI moving forward, right? Where we can now generate so much with the prompts, right? You can get pictures and texts and videos and music out of AI generators. But for me, that is not the same as human creativity, right? Because it's learned from all of the existing stuff, which means it never will be one hundred percent original. It will always just have mixed and matched things. But we as human beings have actual truly disruptive original thoughts, right? Which we should never underestimate. So if we don't start practicing our creative muscle, let's say now, then we will not give the right impulses to AI moving forward to actually help with that originality, but everything would become bland and the same. So in a way, it's both call to action, be more creative at work because that's gonna help you anyway in your career, but also for the sake of society, let's not forget what makes us unique as human beings because we are creative by nature, we just need to do it more.