Free Add-On

TurnClaude's answersintoauditable work

With Count, turn any AI output into an auditable, sharable output for free. Spot hallucinations with ease so you can confidently share answers. It's time we check the work again, and bring our colleagues with us.

114,922 canvases already created
A real Count canvas: a competitive landscape analysis with positioning and supporting data.

Join these teams who are verifying their outputs with Count

AccentureBumbleCleoDoceboInsurelloJustParkKitLeadIQMoneyboxMUBIWriter
AccentureBumbleCleoDoceboInsurelloJustParkKitLeadIQMoneyboxMUBIWriter
AccentureBumbleCleoDoceboInsurelloJustParkKitLeadIQMoneyboxMUBIWriter

How It Works

AI claims. Count checks. Teams share the spoils.

The question isn't “slop” or “not slop.” It's “what's sourced,” “what's inferred,” and what is “plainly hallucinated by the model?” Count makes it clear, and creates a space where your team can find clarity in tandem.

ChatGPT · thread

Mid-market NRR fell to 91.5% in Q1. That is 6 points below the other segments. Competitors are seeing the same pressure. The drop is driven by seat contraction, not logo churn.

Sounds finished. No way to check it.

1) Input

Start with an AI answer

From Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or wherever you already work, push your answers and thinking to Count to identify claims and analyze each one.

Claim lineageShowing 4 of 92
  • Mid-market NRR fell to 91.5% in Q1. Grounded
  • That is 6 points below Reasoned the other segments.
  • Competitors are seeing the same pressure. Unsourced
  • The drop is driven by seat contraction Assumed, not logo churn.

2) Audit

Check every claim's credibility

On the canvas, every claim is mapped out. Trace sources, check logic, and see where the LLM's imagination became a little too active.

Competitor NRR · Q1
UsEntMidAB

Peers A/B from warehouse · 12 min ago

Unsourced

ChatGPT failed to include a source for the competitor claim. @Alice can you retrieve it?

Maya
Ollie

3) Ideate

Challenge the reasoning together.

Invite your team for free and inspect the results together, in real-time. Pick apart claims, crunch data, and maybe get into an argument or two. A human will tell you if you're wrong. Just saying.

Map the model's claims

One claim. The whole argument behind it.

Peek under the hood and follow the model's path of reasoning. On the Count canvas, you can pinpoint it, tweak it, and resolve it.

Sharing is Caring

Bring your friends (and your /skills)

If your teammate's ideas, prompts, and reactions live somewhere else, you're already a step behind. In a shared canvas, everything is just that: shared. Fewer games of telephone, more productivity.

Pop back over to your assistant or use Count's agent without leaving the canvas. Add claims as context, execute arithmetic, develop reports and dashboards, and utilize tools like sub-agents and web search to get closer and closer to the truth.

You probably manage your skills and context in GitHub, Claude, ChatGPT, or Notion. And we love that! Connecting to your chosen business apps is easy with Count. You can also manage context and skills natively, if ya like.

Your audited work deserves an audience, which means you'll be needing set decoration and a stage. In Count, you can design reports, slide decks, apps, and analyses of every shape. Then present them without bouncing to yet another app.

FAQs

Questions, answered

Does this mean yet another tool?

No. You keep working in Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini — wherever you already think. Count is where the output lives when it needs an audience. Viewers just click a link.

Is my data safe?

You control every push. Nothing leaves your AI tool without your say-so. SOC 2 compliant, EU hosting available, and granular permissions when your team grows into them.

Security details

What does it cost?

Pushing and sharing is free for individuals. Paid plans are available when your team is ready to edit and build in the canvas, connect live data sources, and control shared context and permissioning.

See all features Pricing

Does all my chat history get shared?

No. Count only imports the rationale and logic necessary to check key claims, including if you've given it feedback. Personal asides and corrections are largely omitted if deemed irrelevant.