Google launched the BigQuery Data Canvas in pre-release at Google Cloud Next a few weeks ago. We’re excited to see a tech giant like Google finally see what we’ve believed for a while - the canvas is the interface of the future for data.
But what is a data canvas? Why is it better? and How do the Count canvas and Google Data Canvas differ? Let’s dig in…
Anyone who’s switched from a keypad (e.g. Blackberry) to an iPhone knows that user interfaces matter. To move from a mini joystick and a dozen or so buttons to a fully tactile, responsive touchscreen was a key innovation that launched the mobile web and a trillion-dollar market with endless possibilities and applications.
Or to put it another way, though your last Blackberry had an internet browser and some simple application utilities the full potential of these technologies was completely held back by the way the user had to interact with them.
User interfaces bound function.
This is as true in the data industry as it is in mobile technology. Dashboards, pivot tables, and notebooks are the interfaces that we still use. Despite the new technologies, in-memory compute engines, or coding languages data vendors talk about, these interfaces are broadly the same as the ones we had over 20 years ago. (If you don’t believe me look at some screenshots of IBM Cognos and tell me it doesn’t look like PowerBI or any other dashboarding tool).
What’s also true is that despite all these new technologies, organizations still suffer from the same challenges - how to tap into the value of data, and make their teams more data-literate.
This is because the methods in which we interact with the data haven’t broadly changed. Or to put it another way, many data challenges are about user interfaces.
The challenge of interfaces was something my co-founder Oli and I realized back in 2019. A year ago we launched a collaborative notebook platform and realized how limiting this was for both the analyst and the business users they work with.
Around this time, we were increasingly using collaborative canvas tools for our internal workflows. We saw solutions like Figma for designers provided a space where designers could think and work unconstrained but also bring their wider teams into their workflows. We realized these were the interaction paradigms that data desperately needed too.
Canvas interfaces are powerful interaction paradigms for several different reasons:
We’ve been on this journey with the canvas for over 3 years and are fortunate to have 100s of customers using the canvas to work more efficiently and drive greater value from data. So we’re excited to see Google starting to make strides into the same future recently.
We believe the canvas is the interface of the future for data and that means we, perhaps surprisingly, want and expect other vendors to see the benefits and help educate the market.
The benefits of the canvas for working with AI are certainly clear to Google as this is currently the primary use case for their canvas. However, their canvas is missing several very important features that we know are essential for the canvas to drive true value:
There’s nothing like having a heavyweight like Google get stuck in to give you a sense you’re on the right track. However, if there’s one negative of the canvas paradigm, it’s that it is a much less forgiving interface if you don’t get it spot on, which our blood, sweat, and tears can attest to. So though we hope the data canvas category builds, we don’t recommend the wider market to take on the task lightly!